. . . .
Many
fear Mr. Hekmatyar, known for his habit of breaking alliances, could be
a larger political headache in Kabul than he is a military one in the
battlefield, at a time when Mr. Ghani’s coalition administration is
already bogged down with infighting. Although forces loyal to Mr.
Hekmatyar have attacked sporadically — including a 2013 car bombing that killed 16 people, including six American advisers — they have never been considered as serious a threat as the Taliban or the Haqqani network.
Still,
Mr. Hekmatyar is exceptionally divisive. He is accused of causing the
deaths of thousands during the civil war, including the indiscriminate
shelling of Kabul — much like rival warlords who are now allied with the
government or have positions within it. After receiving copious cash
and weaponry from the Americans during the war against the Soviets, he
threw in his lot with remnants of the Communist government, then briefly
with Taliban, and then Al Qaeda. In July last year, he was even rumored
to have pledged allegiance to the Islamic State, though his aides later denied it.
Through
it all, he has remained a prolific writer. He frequently sends letters
to his commanders and has published dozens of books on political and
religious matters, with titles including “Afghanistan
– Another Vietnam for America,” “Dreams and Interpretations,” and
“Bush, the King of Liars.” [Hard to argue with that one – Ed.] More recently, he has also taken to recorded
video messages, modulating his voice like a state-TV anchor as he
recites long lectures and answers recorded questions.
. . . .
According
to officials on both sides of the negotiation, some of the last points
of disagreement were
the timing of removing Mr. Hekmatyar and the
Hezb-i-Islami militant wing from American and United Nations terrorism
lists, and whether Mr. Hekmatyar is willing to renounce relations with
extremist groups outside Afghanistan.
Mr.
Hekmatyar’s group is demanding to be taken off the terrorism lists
before signing the agreement, while American officials have said the
process takes time and can happen only after a formal request from the
Afghan government when the agreement is signed . . . .
– The New York Times, May 11, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment