War - Whom is it good for? Absolutely the Mad King!

By War Correspondent Douglas MacArthur with Legal Editor Saori Shiroseki

We’ve always been interested in the thoughts of national security expert and former FBI official Asha Rangappa on the situation we now face in the regime of the Mad King, because we know we can count on her for a moderate, cool-headed assessment based upon her hard-won expertise from years toiling in the law enforcement Establishment.

Here’s what she had to say last week:

As we continue our free fall into autocracy, there still appears to be no rock bottom in sight. 

Hoo boy. That sounds bad.

But wait -- it gets worse!

Trump needs a reason to escalate his takeover of blue states and cities. If he can provoke confrontation between civilians and the military — perhaps one where there is open gunfire or anything that he can use to claim that our military is under attack or in harm’s way — he can then justify arbitrarily designating Americans as military targets. We are already seeing this with his executive order declaring Antifa a “domestic terrorist organization” (this is not a real thing). ...Notice how [Hegseth] states that they struck people of a “Designated Terrorist Organization” (again, not a real thing)…but he doesn’t say which organization. This is a move to begin conflating ordinary crime, and even ideological beliefs, with “terrorism,” and then using the “terrorist” label as an excuse to use military force.... To bring [America] under his total control and target Americans using military force under the guise of combating “terrorism,” Trump would need a military that is willing to follow illegal orders and commit war crimes.

And illegally blonde Attorney General Pam “What Epstein Files?” Bondi made the connection between supposed foreign drug smugglers and her fellow citizens explicit: 

Although the regime has provided exactly zero evidence proving the dead sailors were in fact smuggling drugs into the United States, it boasts about their murders and now threatens to issue the same license to kill Americans:

“This ain't St. Mere Eglise!”

Bondi said the administration intended to “take the same approach” to antifa as it did with foreign drug cartels — an unsettling vow in light of a series of deadly military strikes against civilian boats in international waters that Trump has ordered as part of a formal “armed conflict.” 

The regime policy of using the military to attack random boats on the high seas and kill their unarmed crews is, to use a highly technical term, a huge f**king crime, both under international and U.S. law. Brian Finucane, a former State Department lawyer, explains:

There is simply no credible argument that an armed conflict exists involving the United States and whoever was on that boat. Nor is there any credible argument that those on the boat presented an imminent threat of armed attack against the United States that could have triggered the initiation of an armed conflict. With neither of these facts being present, we are left with the premeditated killing of human beings, not in armed conflict and not in self-defense. Although the criminal liability of individuals is a matter for the courts, Americans engaging in such conduct would normally risk very serious charges.

Crime and war are different? Who knew?

To sum up where we are as a country, the Attorney General of the United States, with the endorsement of the President (to the extent he is still able to comprehend such things) has vowed to use the U.S. military to kill Americans with the same impunity that is now illegally used against foreigners on boats. The excuse is that something called Antifa is a terrorist organization, like those guys trying to fish in the Caribbean, and therefore [?} the military can mow them down in the absence of anything resembling armed conflict.

Conveniently for the regime and its lickspittles, there is no such entity as Antifa. You can’t head over to the Tony Stark building to visit their headquarters. You can’t donate to their cause and get a nifty tote bag in return. You won’t get plaintive texts from the President of Antifa telling you the triple match on your donation expires at midnight. Antifa doesn’t exist. Therefore apparatchiks like Bondi and confessed puppy killer and Botox abuser Kristi Noem can lie their lifted asses off and declare anyone opposing the regime is Antifa, thereby subjecting them to immediate summary execution. 

We're looking forward to this fall's Supreme Court summary docket,when such executions will be justified by Supreme Lord Brett Kavanaugh and his five fellow doges as a trivial inconvenience by whipping out arguments like this:

The interests of Antifa individuals who are illegally interfering with the enforcement of immigration law is ultimately an interest in evading the law. That is not an especially weighty legal interest.

To add some exciting footage to this nonsense, the regime is considering calling out a crack military detachment: the 82d Airborne, into the raging cauldron of war that is Portland, Oregon. 

This 82nd Airborne? 

 

Like John Wayne in The Longest Day? Or Ryan O’Neal and Robert Redford in A Bridge Too Far? That’s a lot of A-listers for a stint in Portland, Oregon.

You would think that a plan to use deadly force on unarmed Americans opposing government action by dressing up as frogs in front of ICE buildings would shock and appall every single one of us. You'd be wrong,

Just this week, 51 of 53 Republicans voted to give the regime a blank check to carry out such murders including lovable moderate Sen. Susan “Troubled” Collins.

You're following orders from this guy?

If it were us, we wouldn’t vote to reopen the government without a prohibition on invoking the Insurrection Act or using military forces against U.S. citizens without a new authorization from Congress, but we don’t have the keen insights into the popular will of a Hakeem Jeffries or a Sen. Amy “Hot Mess” Klobuchar. 

The public reaction to treating protesters like the Wehrmacht has not been especially positive.  According to recent polling, only 39% (including 79% of Republicans) approve of sending active-duty military forces into American cities.

It's good that the Mad King's latest war on America is opposed by most Americans.  And yet, after watching the madness, chaos, cruelty, and illegality of the Mad King Restoration almost 40% of your fellow citizens approve the destruction of American democracy.  So no one should underestimate the challenge before us.  But no one should despair either. 

And just a reminder to our military: while the Supreme Court has extended immunity to any Republican President committing a crime in office and to any Supreme Court Justice who has committed sexual assault or harassment, they have thus far not extended such immunity to all members of the armed forces. 

Restorations of absolute monarchies tend not to last.  If this one falls, any legitimate government will (or at least should) investigate the crimes committed on its orders. 

So the military (and their civilians enablers) should keep in mind what happens to those who commit crimes to please the Mad King.  Among other indignities, Botox and fillers aren't available to federal prisoners.  If you don't believe us, ask Ghislaine Maxwell.