Editors' Note: The House impeachment managers marshaled their evidence and argued eloquently that a President who extorts a foreign country for solely political gain and then stonewalls the Congress merits impeachment and removal from office. While they were doing so, compelling new evidence emerged, irrefutably proving the facts of the House's case. So what happens? The entire Republican Senate bands together to cover up and dismiss the charges, thereby ensuring that the Grifter-in-Chief will commit even more flagrant misdeeds to ensure his continuing grasp of power.
Kinda depressing, no?
Fear not, the Spy will cheer you up. Instead of throwing your shoes at your television this week as the sorry spectacle of Republican complicity in high crimes plays out before you, why not have some fun with Spy Impeachment Bingo? It's so simple – every time a Republican Senator spouts one of the ridiculous rationalizations they have been fed for voting to cover up Presidential crimes, just check the box. First one who wins gets an NFL tryout, just like Colin Kaepernick!
Extorting campaign help wrong but not impeachable | Dems are trying to overturn 2016 election | Sen. Warren asked a mean question | Like his tax cuts and judges | House should have waited to enforce subpoenas |
If he thought his re-election was a good thing, it's OK - that's what a smart Jew lawyer says | Too close to 2020 election | Schiff referred to CBS news report re U Bum revenge plan | House rushed inquiry | You can't introduce new evidence at a trial |
Desperate Ukraine leader said he didn't feel extorted | Witch hunt | Hunter Biden | House delayed inquiry | Bolton a far-left stooge |
Don't need evidence; we know what happened and it's OK! | Hoax | Impeach- ment too divisive | They all do it, what- ever it is | Senate needs to get back to not working |
He probably won't do it again | Hearsay | President denied due process | Presi- dent didn't say "quid pro quo" | Benghazi [How did that get in there? – Ed.] |
No comments:
Post a Comment