By Legal Editor Saori Shiroseki with Meta-Content Generator A.J. Liebling
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Great Purge of 2026 continued, with the Supreme Leader pushing discredited stock-market tout Pam Bondi into the gravel pit of infamy, where she joins Kristi Noem. Rumors are that the now former Legal Commissar will not be the last to be purged, as the Mad King's paranoia and fear spiral while his regime collapses around him as a result of his own insane diktats.
![]() |
| Pam Bondi, in happier times |
Comrade Bondi, although a loyal bootlicker and apparatchik, apparently failed the Mad King by not indicting and sending to the gulag a sufficient number of the Mad King's political rivals and enemies. Thus far, she has failed to bring to show trial any of the Mad King's targets, including dangerous deviationists like James Comey, Letitia James, Jerome Powell, or Adam Schiff, who all walk the streets as free citizens, an intolerable situation to the all powerful Leader whose whim is Law.
Unlike Comrade Noem, who was fobbed off with a sinecure appointment as Coordinator of the Five Year Plan for the Donroe International, Bondi was unceremoniously dispatched to the uninhabitable swamps of her native Florida.
While everyone enjoyed the spectacle of a cruel nasty incompetent toady getting her just rewards, the outrageousness not only of her conduct but of the reason the Mad King fed her to the alligators got in our view less attention than it deserved.
Since being re-elected, the Mad King, with hte passive or active support of every f****in' Republican, has engaged in a tyrannical attack on the Rule of Law on many fronts, including the perversion of justice involved in using the Department of Justice (among others) to investigate and mount frivolous criminal prosecutions of anyone who dared to oppose him.
His direction to the Department of Justice prosecutors to torment his enemies is both a crime (for which his Republican allies on the bent Supreme Court wrote him a full pre-emptive pardon) and an impeachable offense.
We know this because the late lamented Robert Mueller told us so, with respect to the Mad King's first term efforts, paltry by comparison, to pervert justice into a tool to persecute his enemies and reward his friends.
As a statutory matter, the President’s counsel has argued that a core obstruction-of-justice statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2), does not cover the President’s actions. As a constitutional matter, the President’s counsel argued that the President cannot obstruct justice by exercising his constitutional authority to close Department of Justice investigations or terminate the FBI Director [and] has made a categorical argument that “the President’s exercise of his constitutional authority here to terminate an FBI Director and to close investigations cannot constitutionally constitute obstruction of justice.”
In analyzing counsel’s statutory arguments, we concluded that the President’s proposed interpretation of Section 1512(c)(2) is contrary to the litigating position of the Department of Justice and is not supported by principles of statutory construction.
2 Mueller Report at 159.
As a matter of statutory interpretation, the Mueller Report concluded “Several textual features of Section 1512(c)(2) support the conclusion that the provision broadly prohibits corrupt means of obstructing justice,” and that applying a broad reading of that statute to Presidential obstructions of justice was constitutional.
Having established the legal framwork, Mueller spent hundreds of pages outlining each potential obstruction committed by the Mad King and exonerated him on none of them.
In other words, Mueller and his staff were persuaded that the President's efforts to direct and nobble the investigation into Russian election interference and his later interference in the investigation of that nobbling constituted criminal obstruction of justice.
We also know this because the other insanely corrupt Republican President of recent times, Tricky Dick Nixon, was impeached in 1974 on this charge, inter alia:
![]() |
| He got away with obstruction of justice, too |
He misused the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Secret Service, and other executive personnel, in violation or disregard of the constitutional rights of citizens, by directing or authorizing such agencies or personnel to conduct or continue electronic surveillance or other investigations for purposes unrelated to national security, the enforcement of laws, or any other lawful function of his office; he did direct, authorize, or permit the use of information obtained thereby for purposes unrelated to national security, the enforcement of laws, or any other lawful function of his office; and he did direct the concealment of certain records made by the Federal Bureau of Investigation of electronic surveillance.
When Republicans told him that he would be convicted of such charges, Dick fled for the territories.
So there should have been no doubt that the true reason the Mad King fired Pam Bondi was because she did not effectively carry out the Mad King's repeated obstructions of justice.
An objective lead for a story about her firing would therefore run something like this:
Frustrated by Attorney General Pam Bondi's inability to carry out his orders to obstruct justice by prosecuting his perceived enemies, President Trump today fired her, in a sign that he is likely to intensify his criminal assault on the rule of law.
Is there anything in there that isn't based on facts?
Here's how the Paper of Record reported these momentous events:
President Trump fired Attorney General Pam Bondi on Thursday, removing the nation’s top law enforcement officer after privately venting his frustrations for months over her handling of the Epstein files and her failed efforts to prosecute his political enemies.
See the difference?
In the Times account, it sounds like the firing was either based on insubordination or incompetence, with no mention of the enormity of a President directing his Attorney General to commit crimes by indicting the Mad King's political enemies out of pure spite. Nowhere in the piece does the Times tell the reader that the Mad King's orders for the political prosecution of his opponents is a crime.
The Mad King may be immune from prosecution for such a crime, thanks to six bent Republicans on the Supreme Court, but the newly-unemployed Bondi sure isn't.
The accompanying tick-tock of her defenestration was full of juicy details about who hated whom, but likewise contained no mention of the underlying crimes.
Two takeaways:
1. It is shocking that an obliviously demented President would order his Attorney General to commit crimes, and then fire her because she did a bad job of it.
2. It is even more shocking that 11 years into the Mad King's assault on America, our most respected media have gotten either bored with or inured to his crimes, thus normalizing them.
When a population forgets what the norms of justice and law are, the path is clear for tyranny to flourish. We asked our old friend Lavrenti Beria if he agreed, but he was unavailable.






















