Wednesday, August 19, 2026

How to tell if you're in the middle of a Red Nightmare

By Emma Goldman
Dialectical Materialism Editor

With the world in flames (thanks to him) and the American economy in tatters (ditto), the Mad King has nothing to offer America except fear over the supposedly dreaded specter of Communism, last seen in 1989:

“A generation after we fought and won the cold war against the menace of communism, there is now a resurgence of the communist menace in our land, including from newcomers to our country who embrace ideas totally opposed to our way of life and our great success,” he said in a speech at Mount Rushmore on 3 July, on the eve of the US’s 250th birthday.

He vowed to “vanquish communists quickly” and “send them into exile”.  

He tried to warn us about Communism!

Wow, this sounds really bad. But those of you under 40 may have no idea what the f*** he's talking about (like the Mad King himself). So as a public service before the Spy, like the Congress, takes an entirely undeserved vacation, we thought we'd give you a little primer on the Red Menace.

What's so bad about Communism?  So many things!

1. Absolute power vested in a tyrant who rules by force and terror.  

 The essence of Communism is a totalitarian dictatorship. What does that mean for the poor subjects of such a regime?  

That was fashionista and lifetime FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover explaining it all to his fellow Americans on page of 44 of his tome called Masters of Deceit.  We'll cite this primer simply as Hoover.  

A wannabe Communist dictator seeks power by overthrowing the legitimate institutions of government by force and violence:

President Trump had summoned a mob, including armed extremists and conspiracy theorists, to Washington, DC on the day the joint session of Congress was to meet. He then told that same mob to march on the U.S. Capitol and “fight.” They clearly got the message.  

2.  The rule of law is replaced by the whim of the dictator.

Under communism, a tiny minority, perhaps ten to twenty men, would rule the United States....The Constitution, and all our laws, would be abolished. 

Hoover at 7.

A Communist dictator would ignore our laws and the Constitution, by, for example, trying to repeal a core provision of our Constitution by Executive fiat, Trump v. Barbera, No. 25.-365 (U.S. June 30, 2026), or imposing onerous new taxes without the required Act of Congress, Learning Resources v. Trump, No. 24-1287 (U.S. Feb. 20, 2026).

Such a dictator could, hard as it may be to believe, assume the power to demolish our most cherished buildings and memorials for his own pleasure without lawful authority. 

3.  Destruction of free and open inquiry.

Communists try to overthrow democracies by force

No wonder communism can operate only in the glow of book burnings. No opposite view can be tolerated. “Down with non-party writers!” Lenin demanded. ...Shifts in the Party line also cause book burnings. One New England headquarters, caught in a Party shift, destroyed three barrels of literature. What is “true” today in the Party may not be “true” tomorrow.   Hoover at 157.

The [Communist] Party, in the final analysis, has an interpretation for the whole of human life. Nothing is untouched: science, psychology, sex, love, care of children, literature, history, the origin and end of life. Everything must be absorbed. Communism is a unitary, all-embracing, and absolute system. Hoover at 161.

A Communist dictatorship tries to destroy free and open inquiry by using its powers to destroy its great institutions of higher learning on transparently flimsy or false pretexts.  For example, a major university with an observant Jewish President was sued by Communist functionaries on the order of the dictator on the absurd ground, quickly dismissed, that it fostered a climate of antisemitism.  That same university had been targeted by losing all federal grants because of its supposed opposition to the Communist regime.

Like the ruthless totalitarians they are, the Communists have made it clear that they will continue to attack universities and other citadels of free inquiry:

The administration and the Justice Department seem to have “focused on Harvard as the major private school target, but a number of other private and some public schools have been, and seem to remain, in D.O.J.’s cross hairs,” he said.

But Samuel Bagenstos, a University of Michigan law professor, said the ruling “eliminates any realistic chance that the Trump administration can use a Title VI investigation to coerce Harvard.”

The government has proved “very creative” in devising ways to pressure the university, he said, though “at some point, the folks in the Trump administration will surely realize that they look as ridiculous as Wile E. Coyote trying to catch the Road Runner.”  

Even small colleges in distant places can be crushed for failure to toe the party line. In Florida, for example, one school was destroyed by the Communist regime and books displeasing to that regime were chucked into a dumpster

The New College of Florida is under fire after what appears to be hundreds of books that have been wiped from its collection and discarded on the street....[A] New College student who reported seeing what they believed was up to "thousands" of books being "shoved into a dumpster" behind the college's library.

... "​​There were Bibles, there were stories of Black authors, of Latin authors, female stories, there were LGBTQ+ and queer stories, or trans stories, all thrown into a dumpster. It sends the message that New College of Florida wants to send stories of gender and diversity to the dump, and it was so heartbreaking and also very frustrating.

Those same apparatchiks have banned a total of 700 books from the public schools in that backward state.

4.  Replacing honest government with a corrupt cabal of friends, relatives, and flunkies chosen for their ability to fawn over and flatter a dictator.

Another mark of a Communist dictatorship is that the Communist tyrant replaces competent government officials with fawning toadies who must constantly suck up to him to survive.

In Stalin's Russia, it was a crime to be the first one to stop clapping at a Stalin speech:

An explosion of enthusiastic applause for Joseph Stalin followed a Communist Party conference in 1937.

The dictator must always be fawned over by his flunkies

The ovation went on for three minutes, four, five…

Palms were getting sore, arms were aching, and the older members of the audience were panting with exhaustion.

According to dissident author Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the clapping continued for 11 minutes. "It was becoming insufferably silly even to those who really adored Stalin. However, who would dare be the first to stop?" he wrote in The Gulag Archipelago.

"With make-believe enthusiasm on their faces, looking at each other with faint hope, the district leaders were just going to go on and on applauding till they fell where they stood, till they were carried out of the hall on stretchers!"  

Fun fact: the first to stop applauding was in fact sent to the Gulag. 

Today Communist dictators insist on the same level of fawning from their flunkies, enforced by fear:

During Tuesday's marathon 3-hour and 16-minute Cabinet meeting at the White House, Special Envoy Steve Witkoff offered a masterclass in sycophancy. One real estate developer sucking up to another.

"Mr. President, working for this government, for you, is the greatest honor of my life," he told his golfing buddy. "I tell it to everybody, and I really do feel that way, and I thank you because it's a privilege to go out there and represent you in your humanitarian effort, in your goals of solving conflicts all over the world."


Israel had just killed 20 people, including journalists, at a Gaza hospital, and Trump was deploying U.S. troops to crack down on Americans in their own capital. But the irony of casting the president as a peacemaker was entirely lost on Witkoff.

As a result, the Communist tyrant's flunkies and enablers live in fear of losing favor with the absolute ruler:

President Donald Trump said Tuesday he had not yet made a determination about whether Jeanine Pirro's job is safe in his strongest public comments yet on her future as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia.

The remarks came after Trump told reporters on Monday in the Oval Office that Pirro "choked" and "folded like an umbrella" in dropping the charges against former Olympian David Hearn, who was accused of damaging the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool.

Pirro then showed up to the White House on Monday afternoon with a banker's box in tow full of evidence as she prepared to defend her decision to the president, according to sources familiar with the meeting. 

Which is why a Communist regime drives out anyone who is competent to carry out the work of government and replaces them with otherwise-unemployable suck-ups. 

5.  The use of tools of terror, like murder, torture, and imprisonment of non-criminals in Gulags   

Stalin [the Communist dictator of the old USSR, for you Gen Z'ers] acted not through persuasion, explanation, and patient cooperation with people, but by imposing his concepts and demanding absolute submission to his opinion. Whoever opposed this concept or tried to prove his viewpoint, and the correctness of his position—was doomed to ... subsequent moral and physical annihilation. Hoover at 44 

It is a hallmark of Communist regimes to build vast shadowy detention facilities where men, women, and even children can be held without criminal conviction on flimsy or no grounds.  In these gruesome network of prison camps, helpless detainees are regularly mistreated and denied medical care and palatable food and water.  Too often, the miserable wretches die in custody from their mistreatment and neglect:

At just one Communist-run Gulag in the wilds of the Texas desert,

Dozens of people held at a sprawling Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Texas say they were either beaten by guards or witnessed others being beaten, according to a new report issued by legal and human rights advocates.

Dreaded internal security czar poses at Gulag

The 84-page report issued jointly Wednesday by Human Rights Watch and the American Civil Liberties Union also says men and women held at Camp East Montana, located at the U.S. Army’s Fort Bliss in El Paso, recounted being denied necessary medical care, forced to live in filthy conditions and fed inedible meals. Detainees also said they were prevented from contacting their lawyers or family members.

Of the 71 detainees contacted over a five month period, 64 — about 90% of those interviewed — said they had either personally been assaulted by the staff or had seen others physically abused, according to the report.    

And Communist regimes are known for instilling terror by gloating about the torture and mistreatment they impose with impunity.  Even today, in Communist states, the armed secret police are now authorized to impose painful electric shocks by wearing special gloves.  One of the advantages of these torture devices is said to be they leave no marks on the victims.

Some of the most extreme Red regimes even enlist the Communist International to build huge torture centers and then move their own people hundreds of miles in chains to be held forever without trial in such infernal dungeons.  The apparatchiks who devise such cruelty enjoy posing in front of their victims.

 6.  State ownership of the means of production.

A central tenet of totalitarian Communism is:

All property used in production would be confiscated, thus leading ultimately to total communization, meaning state ownership.  Hoover at 7

It should be obvious that allowing a corrupt Communist tyrant to acquires private enterprises transforms what should be an efficient free economy into a twisted command economy, in which all enterprises respond to the whims of the dictator rather than the interests of consumers.

The concentration of ownership in the hands of a Communist elite also provides them with an immense power that they can use for their own nefarious ends:

The Trump administration has taken direct stakes in companies on a scale rarely seen in the U.S. outside wartime or economic crisis, ...

Japan’s Nippon Steel agreed to give President Donald Trump a “golden share” in U.S. Steel as a condition for the two companies’ controversial merger. Trump now personally wields sweeping veto power over major business decisions made by the nation’s third-largest steel producer.

“You know who has the golden share? I do,” Trump said at a summit on artificial intelligence and energy in Pittsburgh on July 15.


....But the Trump administration demonstrated earlier this month that it is also willing to buy directly into publicly traded corporations. The Department of Defense agreed to purchase a $400 million equity stake in rare-earth miner MP Materials, making the Pentagon the company’s largest shareholder.

....Trump’s unique hold over the Republican Party gives him the ability to intervene in companies on a scale that would be difficult politically for a Democratic president,[ who]... would have been accused of being a communist ....
 

7.  Use of war to keep the masses focused on an external enemy

In his classic work 1984, George Orwell noted that a totalitarian regime such as Communism uses constant war to oppress the people and amass even more unaccountable power.

Today Communist dictators use wars of aggression to distract from the grotesque sex crimes committed by those dictators and to amass even more wealth and power for themselves and a small clique of family members and other hangers-on:

Despite the administration’s denials, it’s hard to avoid the perception that Kushner is leveraging his influence over US policy – and his proximity to the president – to drum up new business for his company. It’s also clear that Kushner is raising money for his personal benefit as Trump has plunged the US into a war against Iran, which has caused immense destruction across the Middle East and global disruption in energy prices and supply. 

What could be more un-American? 

8.  The belief that the leader is infallible:

You should have seen Stalin’s fury! How could it be admitted that he, Stalin, had not been right! He is after all a “genius,” and a genius cannot help but be right! Everyone can err, but Stalin considered that he never erred, that he was always right. He never acknowledged to anyone that he made any mistake, large or small, despite the fact that he made not a few mistakes in the matter of theory and in his practical activity. Hoover at 45 

The belief in the infallibility of a dictator, now matter how compromised or even demented he is, is a hallmark of Communist totalitarianism.  No democracy could survive when Communist stooges in positions of power make statements like these:

[South Carolina Republican Senator Darlene Graham] said, "I realize the price of gas is a little high right now, but I think President Trump is gonna get us through this and the price of gas will eventually come down . . . I believe in him when it comes to dealing with Iran." 

And when a Communist dictator tried to repeal the U.S. Constitution by decree, one of his strongest supporters, supposedly a well-educated lawyer, toed the illegal party line:


And the drivel put out by the talking heads of Communist propaganda outlets is if anything more outrageous:

I think what the president has done militarily and economically is historic. I think our military has been spectacular. I think cutting off the strait was genius. And we have the enemy exactly where we want them.

Source: Media Matters for America.

Of course, having to mouth Party lies destroys the reputation of the former journalists who now kowtow to the Red Nightmare:

[Fox “News” host Maria] Bartiromo has fallen far—from a business journalist to a right-wing propaganda machine—as was exposed in Dominion Voting Systems’ massive defamation lawsuit against Fox News. The looking glass has been shattered for Bartiromo, who now spends her days spinning falsehoods about Trump’s ties to Epstein and denying climate change. 

We could go on, and on, and on, but you catch our drift: Communist dictatorship is truly a nightmare.  Just anyone who's living through it. 

Sunday, August 9, 2026

The Boston Globe cracks the case of Boston's missing mojo by rounding up the usual woke suspects

By Harold Traveler
City Desk

We woke up to the news that in the dead of night the Senate discharged its constitutional duty to advise and consent to the nomination of the architect of the lawless Epstein child rape file coverup to the position of, wait for it, Attorney General of the United States.

Their work done, they fled for a richly-unearned six week vacation.  Fortunately, by voting for Blanche at 4:30 a.m. they were able to make the 7 a.m. shuttle and their lunch date in the Hamptons.

Where's the mojo, asks the Boston Globe?

Sen. Mitch McConnell's (R – Hadestown) staff put out a statement, faithfully transcribed by all media, in which the totally alive Senator “said,”  “I was thrilled to support Todd Blanche's confirmation and look forward to many productive 20-minute telephone calls with him.”  According to the press release, McConnell was so happy he danced a Kentucky reel before doing a couple of handsprings.

With these spineless cowards and poltroons flying under the radar until well after Labor Day, our thoughts turn closer to home.

How's it going in the Hub of the Universe?

An untutored observer might conclude things are doing just fine.  The city enjoyed two huge festivals this summer – the World Cup and the Tall Ships.  Hundreds of thousands enjoyed themselves without incident, except for the threat posed by the Scots of drinking the town dry.  Even the formerly wretched Red Sox are on a tear, due not at all to their world-championship caliber disabled list.

But if you ask our business community and their jock-sniffers at the Boston Globe, the city has lost its mojo, whatever the f*** that is:

Boston has lost its swagger. Talk to people across industries and you’ll hear that the boundless vibrancy we once took for granted has faded. The World Cup brought a jolt of energy that disappeared as suddenly as it arrived, a reminder of how enervated this city, especially downtown, can feel. 

Oh, yes, let's decide that Boston is in the dumpster because rich s***s, interviewed by text from their $12 million oceanfront estates in Osterville, say so.

And what pray tell do these titans think us plebes should do about it?  You'll never guess:

And the state’s economic engine — a turbocharged model that outperformed from the early 1980s to the pandemic in 2020 — is sputtering. If Massachusetts doesn’t become a more attractive place to live and run a business, more people and jobs will leave and the quality of life here will fray. 

Let's see: Boston has a highly educated workforce, internationally-renowned universities, a well-developed network of sophisticated enterprise support services, like lawyers and private equity, access to world-class health care, a healthy environment, an international airport, and fried clams.  What else is needed to grow a business and thrive in Boston?

Any guesses? The tycoons are complaining about “a broken housing market, soaring living costs, high taxes, an aging population, the hostile White House.”

Well, if they are so upset about the Mad King's hostility to their beloved home town, maybe they could do something about it, like stop filling the coffers of Republican dark-money PAC's and start speaking out about his assault on American democracy.   

Want mojo?  Pay the man!

As for the aging population, that's a national problem.  There's a simple cure for it: immigration.  Letting young immigrant families stay, rather than torturing and tormenting them, would be a great way to grow the nation's base of young families, consumers, and taxpayers.  And that's why these moguls have been so outspoken in their opposition to the Mad King's persecution of immigrants, amirite?

As for high taxes, taxes here aren't higher than in, say, the capitalist paradise of California, as calculated by the same right-wing source cited by Edelman.  And the millionaire's tax imposed beginning in 2022 hasn't caused an exodus of immiserated job creators to more business-friendly places like Alabama or North Dakota.  

Just today, The Boston Globe reported on a young Quincy entrepreneur who located his business to Silicon Valley. Why? Let's see: both taxes and living costs are higher there than here, so that can't be it.  It turns out that the venture capital community in Boston wouldn't fund his pitch, but the one in California did.  Is that really the fault of Mayor Wu and Governor Healy? 

The other factor mentioned is that Massachusetts enforces noncompetes, thereby reducing mobility and choices for young techies.  California doesn't.  That's because the business poo-bahs here like noncompetes because the closer their employees are to indentured servitude, the more advantageous for them.

So we can't wait for the 40-part Globe series blaming craven venture capitalists and self-interested business moguls for the supposed decline in mojo levels. 

There is in all this garbage one point of legitimate concern: the crushing cost of housing in Massachusetts is driving out young families.  That's largely because unlike booming hellholes like Phoenix or Dallas, developers can't just feast on open wasteland and build vast housing tracts.  This part of the world has been settled for centuries, and if you go 40 miles from State House dome you don't find prairie or desert, you find Worcester.  [Same difference – Ed.]

The obvious solution is to try to build housing where there's open space, especially denser transit-adjacent sites.  For example, five miles from downtown, on the Blue Line, there's a defunct race track once known as Suffolk Downs.

How's that going?

The Boston authorities approved a huge new transit-friendly dense development six years ago.  Since then nothing has been built on the Boston half of the site.

Whose fault is that?

If you said that it's the fault of the developer who promised to build the project and then sat on their Texas billionaire asses, you're wrong, according to the business shills [Surely, editors? – Ed.] at The Boston Globe.

The real problem according to them is that Boston requires a portion of the apartments to be affordable, and it won't shtup the developers with huge decades-long tax cuts. 

The Globe sees the choice as binary: either bribe the developer or leave the site empty.

That's not actually the complete list of options.  The youngish tigers at the Globe may not remember this, but there was a time in America when government built hundreds of thousands of units of affordable housing.  Today, hundreds of thousands of families still live in them.

More recently, in New York, a program called Mitchell-Lama succeeded in building hundreds of thousands of units of affordable housing:

By offering developers low-interest-rate mortgages that covered up to 95% of project costs, generous property tax breaks that reduced operating costs over time, and, sometimes, a ready-made site to build on, New York City and State funded the creation of permanent units, kept so by limiting developers’ profits and, initially, placing perpetual restrictions on how much a co-op share could be sold for and how much a rental apartment could be rented for. 

We are aware that in recent years, the housing has become less affordable as owners have bought and flipped their units.  That's something that could be easily tweaked.

In any event, why not try it at Suffolk Downs?  The problem with bribing developers, as recommended by the Boston Globe, is the same as bribing the Mad King: it's not a purchase, it's a subscription.  You have to keep paying the protection.

In other words, it's a racket.

In the meantime, subsidizing low and limited profit development organizations could hardly do worse than six years of futility in East Boston.  If you're looking for a mojo generator that doesn't involve spending millions of tax dollars to line the pockets of rich a******s, look no further. 

Saturday, August 1, 2026

In response to the Mad King's abuses of power, Democrats say: let's give him some more!


By Nellie Bly, Washington Correspondent

Even the meanest intelligence by this time knows what is going on in America: there is an ongoing Fascist coup against democratic government and the rule of law led by the Mad King and blindly supported by all Congressional Republicans and the six bent Republican Lords of Justice.

The details shouldn’t need to be repeated but because each day our mass media re-enacts “Memento” by having to learn from scratch these simple truths, let’s mention a few.

  • The Mad King has corrupted the Department of Justice by ordering it to gin up lawless prosecutions of his political enemies, one of which collapsed last night in a puddle of Franzia.
  • The Mad King’s handlers have created an unaccountable masked secret police and unleashed it not only on immigrants but on American citizens who stand in its way, and have set up a network of for-profit prisons and airlines to terrorize immigrants into surrendering their legal rights.
  • The Mad King’s drug-addled minions have embarked on a crusade to destroy America’s nonpolitical armed forces by forcing out anyone with dark skin or a vagina, and have ordered them to carry out murder on the high seas for the sadistic enjoyment of said Mad King.
  • The Mad King and his co-conspirators have decided to ignore or override appropriations passed by Congress and signed into law to punish political adversaries and rig all elections going forward.
  • The Mad King has tried to override the Constitution by Executive Order, and needs only one more bent Justice to succeed.
Give him more power?  Why not?

But our focus today is on foreign policy, where the Mad King abuses his statutory authority, or simply assumes powers he doesn’t have, to bully and intimidate long-standing allies by threatening or imposing tariffs (which are in fact sales taxes on American consumers and businesses) and sanctions. Some of that was even too much for the Lords of Justice.

By now it is clear that the Mad King cannot be expected to exercise any authority granted by Congress in a lawful manner.

So how are Democrats responding to this pattern of continual illegal conduct?

Why, of course, by giving the Mad King even more powers to abuse!

The sanctions legislation that moved forward in the Senate this week goes beyond enacting new financial restrictions on Russia and Iran. It also gives President Trump broad new powers to impose tariffs on imports from some of the world’s largest economies. ...But tucked inside the legislation are tools that would give the Trump administration sweeping discretion to impose steep tariffs on major buyers of Russian energy products. ...

The policy could lead to additional levies on billions of dollars’ worth of products imported from China, India and European Union countries.

And there’s no chance the Mad King would abuse any “broad new powers” to impose tariffs on every f***in’ country in the world, if only out of spite.

I mean, no Democrat would be stupid enough to fall for this con job, right?

The vote was 86 to 12, with nearly all Republicans and a majority of Democrats joining together to push it well beyond the 60 votes needed to tee up a final vote.

So 36 Democrats voted to place vast new powers in the little diseased mitts of the Mad King.

Why, ffs?

Democrats claim that the bill will help Ukraine in defending itself against the Mad King’s stalwart ally, Vladimir Putin’s Russia and regard it as a bipartisan tribute to Sen. Lindsay Graham, now dead. Apparently installing a depraved sex offender on the Supreme Court was an insufficient tribute to the late Mad King-taint-polishing Solon.

In fact, Democrats know exactly what they are doing:

Who wouldn't trust the Lyin' King?

Senator Peter Welch, Democrat of Vermont, was among those who voted against moving ahead with the bill. He cited language in the legislation that allowed the White House to go after “facilitators” of the sale of Russian oil with tariffs, which he said was not narrowly defined enough and could be taken advantage of by Mr. Trump.

Well, duh.

Of course the Mad King is going to abuse any supposed tariff authority he has to punish and intimidate any country that dares to stand up to him, like Denmark or Canada. We know that because he’s done it.

And what happens when the Mad King imposes new 100% tariffs on say Canada or Spain for allegedly buying Russian oil, or somehow “facilitating” those transactions?

The bill’s proponents point to Section 113, which limits sanctions to the top five importers or facilitators of Russian oil.

And if the Mad King falsely declares Spain to be among the top five, in the same way that he falsely claimed – well, really every word that comes out of his mouth every day? What will Congress do then? They can pass a resolution of disapproval subject to the Mad King’s vetoes. And we all can rest assured that the independent Republican stalwarts in the House and Senate will judge any such resolution strictly on its merits and not on the Mad King’s threats to primary them with Laura Loomer or Alina Habba.

Or if the Mad King lumps the entire European Union together as one entity since it’s a single trading bloc? That’s far less frivolous than most of his bulls*** claims.

The potential for abuse has not entirely escaped the attention of sentient human beings:

There is no limitation, the president can decide which countries this bill applies and hit them with a 100% tariff for five years. Historically, tariff provisions required either long investigations in advance, consultation with Congress, or imposed short, limited durations. This one does not.

— Aaron Fritschner (@fritschner.bsky.social) July 28, 2026 at 12:59 PM

Mr. Fritschner also points out that the sanctions against Russia can be waived by the Mad King in his demented discretion in the event he turns out to be a Putin stooge. 

The Washington lobby that represents big U.S. exporters also warns that this new authority would be bad for its members and their workers:

“Congressional leaders ought to consider the long-term effects of the sanctions legislation they seem ready to ram through. Yesterday, the President used a nearly 100-year-old statute for the first time to impose tariffs on Canada. Once Congress delegates an authority, it is nearly impossible to claw it back or control its use.

“We urge Congress not to sleepwalk through this process. Congressional leadership should revisit the tariff provisions in the bill, decouple them from sanctions enforcement measures, and include guardrails and best practices that preserve Congressional authority.” 

When even the highly-compensated cautious flacks for big business think your legislation is bad, you would think that Republicans and schnorring Democrats would listen.

Not this time.  Their grief over Lindsay's demise has blinded them.  

As for the Democrats, what's the problem with pandering to the Mad King?

Source: The Associated Press.

In three months, the United States will hold, we hope, elections that will decide the future of our democracy.  Midterm elections are all about motivating your party's base to turn out. They stay home, you lose.  

Maybe Sen. Blumenthal and his Democratic colleagues might reflect a moment about why Democrats aren't thrilled with the direction of their party before voting to give a tyrant enormous and unconstrained new powers, after watching him abuse his powers since he was inaugurated.

We know it's sad about your buddy Lindsay, but as for us we'd rather have democracy than Belle-Reve.