By Meta-Content Generator A.J. Liebling with
Edward Whalley in New Haven
Isaac Chotiner on insufferable New York Times and former Harvard Salient columnist Ross Douthat?
The guy who eviscerated intellectual frauds like Richard Epstein and Counselor Underpants himself, Alan Dershowitz? This was going to be good!
Reader, it wasn't. It was very bad.
The trouble began on the very first line:
This summer, Ross Douthat, liberal America’s favorite conservative commentator, ...
Ever met anyone in liberal America who thinks that, other than his supposed friends and colleagues on the Times Editorial Page, who have to say something, anything, not horrible about this guy? Thank you, Michelle Goldberg.
But in case you thought your friend Isaac was just applying a little soft-soap before getting down to cases, read on:
Douthat, who joined the Times in 2009, occupies an all but vanished position: he is a Christian conservative who lives among liberals, writes for them, and—even when he is arguing against abortion, or against “woke progressivism”—has their respectful attention.
Again, who on the left respects Douthat's ceaseless efforts to control the bodies of half the American population? He may have our attention, like the various cast members of The Aristocrats, but it's hardly respectful.
Let's start with the bloody coathanger in the room: his unrelenting campaign to justify taking away a woman's right to an abortion and to force her to give birth to any unwanted pregnancy, even those arising out of incest or rape:
Although he attempts to base his views on “science,” in fact it's based solely on Catholic metaphysics which concludes, not based on anything that Jesus Christ fella was known to have said, that a 64-cell zygote is a unique human being. It follows by Jesuit logic that aborting it is just the same as firing high-powered machine gun bullets into a classroom of children (which Ross doesn't seem to be too bothered by).
If his claim that “science,” was on his side, you'd expect his views to be shared by all reputable biologists and medical professionals. Of course it isn't, which means that either those scientists don't understand life science as well as liberal America's favorite conservative commentator, or, more likely, his whole science-based argument is utter bollocks.
By the way, if what Mr. Respectful Attention has to say is true, that means that between 800,000 and 1,400,000 American women commit murder every year, joined by hundreds of thousands of medical accomplices. That's a lot of murderers walking among us.
You don't have to be St. Thomas Aquinas to understand that if your conclusion is bats*** crazy, maybe your premises are off, even if you can get Michelle Goldberg to paint some lip gloss on your extremist religious views.
(The paragraph in which Goldberg, who does not believe that that abortion is murder, tries to defend her favorite conservative constitutes the entirety of Chotiner's discussion of Douthat's extreme views on abortion.)
Do pro-choice progressives actually admire Douthat, as Chotiner insists? Let's ask Rewire News Group, a reliable source of news and opinion on matters of interest to women, like their reproductive freedom:
You can feel the respect.
Here's another respectful admiring comment by a former Rewire columnist:
Ross Douthat...has sketched an utterly fantastical vision of what he sees a post-Roe America looking like in Imagining A Prolife America.
It's maddening for all kinds of reasons, but mostly for its utter ignorance of what's happening in countries where abortion is illegal. (Hint: the truth doesn't bear out his "assumption" that "a ban on abortion, by changing the incentives of sexual behavior and family formation, would actually end up reducing out-of-wedlock births, welfare spending, and all the rest of it.").
The columnist was Michelle Goldberg.
Chotiner never bothers to examine the substance of Douthat's cruel and nutty positions on abortion and birth control although he does mention in passing that Douthat advocates denying legal protection to same-sex couples who wish to marry and parent children and get on with their lives with the same legal respect and dignity accorded to different-sex couples. Chotiner does let the subject of his story offer up countless windy generalizations, e.g., “he is also fascinated by other forms of spirituality and by the supernatural, as well as, in the case of U.F.O.s, by the simply unexplainable.”[Like why the New York Times prints his crap? – Ed.]
Instead The New Yorker's once-fearless correspondent holds forth at great length about Douthat's family background (his mother was a whackjob too, so he comes by it honestly), and his blissful home life in bucolic New Haven, Conn., with his wife and four children. What this has to do with anything relevant to Douthat's faux-intellectual extremist views is not apparent to the reader, but it does serve to both humanize and legitimize an otherwise creepy guy whom no one would have lunch with in Leverett House.
Which was probably Douthat's pitch all along. Instead of relegating Chotiner to an icy telephone interview, Douthat love-bombed Chotiner by inviting him into his beautiful home and meeting his beautiful wife.
But Douthat is not your beautiful automobile. Instead, he's a hack who has bought into reactionary Catholic metaphysics and sees his God-given duty as imposing it on the rest of us.
Is that admirable? Listen to the story of Hadley Duvall, raped and impregnated by her stepfather when she was 12:
#KYGov: The Andy Beshear campaign is up on TV with this spot --
— Medium Buying (@MediumBuying) September 20, 2023
Hadley to camera:
"This is to you, Daniel Cameron. To tell a 12-year-old girl she must have the baby of her stepfather who raped her is unthinkable" pic.twitter.com/2tW09U4ZUO
No word on whether Ross Douthat is Hadley Duvall's favorite conservative philosopher.
That's probably because Chotiner decided not to interview any victims of Douthat's forced-birth Crusade. They might have cast a pall over Chotiner's piece about a lovable deep-thinking family man.
It also might have been what some of us call “journalism.” It's a pity that Isaac Chotiner decided to give up on that honorable profession.
No comments:
Post a Comment